|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Complex by Design
Investigating Pathways Into Teaching in New York City Schools
Donald J. Boyd
State University of New York-Albany
Pam Grossman
Stanford University
Hamilton Lankford
State University of New York-Albany
Susanna Loeb
Stanford University
Nicholas M. Michelli
City University of New York
Jim Wyckoff
State University of New York-Albany
New York City represents a microcosm of the changes that are shaking the very foundations of teacher education in this country. In their efforts to find teachers for hard-to-staff schools by creating multiple pathways into teaching, districts from New York City to Los Angeles are in the midst of what amounts to a national experiment in how best to recruit, prepare, and retain teachers. This article provides an overview of a research project that examines features of these different pathways into teaching in New York City schools and the impact of these features on where teachers teach, how long they remain in the classroom, and student achievement in reading and math as measured by value-added analyses. The article provides both a conceptual framework for the study and a discussion of some of the methodological challenges involved in such research, including problems of selection bias, difficulties in documenting programmatic features, and challenges of estimating teacher effects on student achievement.
Key Words: outcomes of teacher education pathways value-added analyses of teacher education
Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 57, No. 2,
155-166 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0022487105285943

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. G. Conklin
Purposes, Practices, and Sites: A Comparative Case of Two Pathways Into Middle School Teaching
American Educational Research Journal,
June 1, 2009;
46(2):
463 - 500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Borko and J. A. Whitcomb
Teachers, Teaching, and Teacher Education: Comments on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel's Report
Educational Researcher,
December 1, 2008;
37(9):
565 - 572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Boyd, P. L. Grossman, K. Hammerness, R. H. Lankford, S. Loeb, M. McDonald, M. Reininger, M. Ronfeldt, and J. Wyckoff
Surveying the Landscape of Teacher Education in New York City: Constrained Variation and the Challenge of Innovation
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
December 1, 2008;
30(4):
319 - 343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Grossman, K. M. Hammerness, M. McDonald, and M. Ronfeldt
Constructing Coherence: Structural Predictors of Perceptions of Coherence in NYC Teacher Education Programs
Journal of Teacher Education,
September 1, 2008;
59(4):
273 - 287.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Day, P. Sammons, and Q. Gu
Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies in Research on Teachers' Lives, Work, and Effectiveness: From Integration to Synergy
Educational Researcher,
August 1, 2008;
37(6):
330 - 342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Grossman
Responding to Our Critics: From Crisis to Opportunity in Research on Teacher Education
Journal of Teacher Education,
February 1, 2008;
59(1):
10 - 23.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Ball and F. M. Forzani
2007 Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture--What Makes Education Research "Educational"?
Educational Researcher,
December 1, 2007;
36(9):
529 - 540.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Crocco and A. T. Costigan
The Narrowing of Curriculum and Pedagogy in the Age of Accountability Urban Educators Speak Out
Urban Education,
November 1, 2007;
42(6):
512 - 535.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|