Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Special Issue call for papers

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Teacher Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullough, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by Draper, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Making Sense of a Failed Triad

Mentors, University Supervisors, and Positioning Theory

Robert V. Bullough, Jr.

Center for the Improvement of Teacher Education and Schooling (CITES), Brigham Young University

Roni Jo Draper

Brigham Young University

Mentoring is often portrayed as an unqualified good. Teacher educators claim that mentoring holds promise for beginning teacher development, increased retention of novice teachers, and mentorteacher improvement. Drawing on positioning theory, this study describes negotiation of power and position in a failed triad composed of a public school mentor, a university mathematics supervisor, and an intern teacher. Data reveal how each member of the triad sought to make sense of his or her experience and to accomplish desired aims. The activity of positioning and being positioned within the triad profoundly shaped each participant’s experience and ultimately interfered with the intern’s induction into teaching.

Key Words: mentoring • beginning teacher development • university supervision • positioning theory

Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 55, No. 5, 407-420 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022487104269804
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational PolicyHome page
D. Anagnostopoulos, N. T. Buchanan, C. Pereira, and L. F. Lichty
School Staff Responses to Gender-Based Bullying as Moral Interpretation: An Exploratory Study
Educational Policy, July 1, 2009; 23(4): 519 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
S. W. Valencia, S. D. Martin, N. A. Place, and P. Grossman
Complex Interactions in Student Teaching: Lost Opportunities for Learning
Journal of Teacher Education, May 1, 2009; 60(3): 304 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
A. Cook-Sather and B. Youens
Repositioning Students in Initial Teacher Preparation: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Learning to Teach for Social Justice in the United States and in England
Journal of Teacher Education, January 1, 2007; 58(1): 62 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]