This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Whipp, J. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Scaffolding Critical Reflection in Online Discussions

Helping Prospective Teachers Think Deeply about Field Experiences in Urban Schools

Marquette University

A teacher educator uses the methodology of a design experiment to compare patterns and levels of reflection in two semesters of her students" e-mail discussions about field experiences in urban schools. Analysis of discussion transcripts during the earlier semester revealed that higher levels of reflection were rare. With a number of changes in both the design and level of support for the discussions, students during the second semester were more inclined to write at higher levels of reflection. Important scaffolds for higher levels of reflection seemed to be tailored and general questioning from the instructor and peers, critical readings on problematic issues and inequities in urban schools, and certain online discussion threads where students were jointly analyzing sociopolitical and moral aspects of critical incidents in the field. In light of this study, suggestions are offered for future use of electronic exchanges in teacher education courses and programs.

Key Words: online discussions • critical reflection • preservice field experiences • urban teacher preparation

Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 54, No. 4, 321-333 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0022487103255010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?